AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Colombian Gold
vs Super Silver Haze

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Colombian Gold specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Colombian Gold ↗
Super Silver Haze — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Super Silver Haze ↗
Classificationsativasativa
BreederNot verifiedGreen House Seeds
THC · catalog reference20%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneLimoneneMyrcene
TerpenesLimonene, Myrcene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaCitrus, Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusRegional originAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedSkunk (unspecified) (Ancestry component), Northern Lights (Ancestry component), Haze (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesColombian Gold is associated with Colombia’s Santa Marta mountains. Leafly describes this regional landrace as a contributor to the later Skunk 1 family. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Super Silver Haze is attributed to Green House Seeds and a background involving Skunk, Northern Lights and Haze. The source supplies those ancestry names but does not establish the exact sequence of crosses.
Source reports · whole profile2302,417

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Myrcene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Colombian Gold and 21% for Super Silver Haze. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →