AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Face Off OG
vs Permanent Marker

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Face Off OG specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Face Off OG ↗
Permanent Marker — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Permanent Marker ↗
Classificationindicahybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference22%25%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsNot verifiedJealousy (Reported parent)
Lineage statusPhenotype selectionReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedBiscotti (Ancestry component)
Selected fromOG Kush (Phenotype selection)Not verified
Lineage notesFace Off OG is associated with Archive Seeds and a California OG Kush selection from the late 1990s. This is represented as selection history rather than an invented two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Leafly reports a (Biscotti × Sherb Bx) × Jealousy background; Biscotti is therefore retained as ancestry rather than simplified into an immediate parent.
Source reports · whole profile195360

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 22% for Face Off OG and 25% for Permanent Marker. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →