AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Fire OG
vs SFV OG Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Fire OG — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Fire OG ↗
SFV OG Kush — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
SFV OG Kush ↗
Classificationhybridindica
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference20%19%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsOG Kush (Reported parent), SFV OG Kush (Reported parent)SFV OG (Reported parent · disputed)
Lineage statusReported parentageDisputed parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesFire OG is reported as OG Kush crossed with SFV OG Kush. The latter is distinct from SFV OG, so the two names are not merged in its parent links. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.The current source names OG Kush as the other parent, conflicting with the previously captured SFV OG account. That disputed second edge is omitted pending corroboration. Overlapping SFV aliases are not assigned to both profiles.
Source reports · whole profile1,260253

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Fire OG and 19% for SFV OG Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →