AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Forbidden Fruit
vs Master Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Forbidden Fruit — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Forbidden Fruit ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Master Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Master Kush ↗
Classificationindicaindica
BreederNot verifiedWhite Label Seed Company
THC · catalog reference15%17%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, LimoneneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, CitrusEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsCherry Pie (Reported parent), Tangie (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesForbidden Fruit connects Cherry Pie with Tangie. The source describes purple coloration and a fruit-associated aroma, characteristics that can vary between individual samples. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Master Kush is attributed to the Dutch White Label Seed Company. Leafly describes two regional landrace parents from the Hindu Kush area but does not identify their individual accessions. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,0191,826

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 15% for Forbidden Fruit and 17% for Master Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →