AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Gelato #33
vs Pink Panties

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Gelato #33 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Gelato #33 ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Pink Panties specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Pink Panties ↗
Classificationhybridindica
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference20%19%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneNot verified
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneCaryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalPepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedBurmese Kush (Reported parent), Florida Kush backcross (Reported parent)
Lineage statusPhenotype selectionReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromGelato (Phenotype selection)Not verified
Lineage notesGelato #33 is a numbered selection from the Gelato family. Its family background is Sherbert with Thin Mint GSC; the selection link keeps it distinct from the general Gelato record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Pink Panties is reported as Burmese Kush crossed with a Florida Kush backcross. The backcross designation is preserved because it is more specific than the broad Florida Kush name. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile41788

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Gelato #33 and 19% for Pink Panties. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →