AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Gelato #33
vs Wedding Crasher

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Gelato #33 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Gelato #33 ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Wedding Crasher specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Wedding Crasher ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedSymbiotic Genetics
THC · catalog reference20%21%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneCaryophyllene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedWedding Cake (Reported parent), Purple Punch (Reported parent)
Lineage statusPhenotype selectionReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromGelato (Phenotype selection)Not verified
Lineage notesGelato #33 is a numbered selection from the Gelato family. Its family background is Sherbert with Thin Mint GSC; the selection link keeps it distinct from the general Gelato record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Wedding Crasher, also listed as Wedding Crashers, is associated with Symbiotic Genetics. Its reported parents are Wedding Cake and Purple Punch. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile417358

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Gelato #33 and 21% for Wedding Crasher. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →