AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

LA Confidential
vs Shiva Skunk

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified LA Confidential specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
LA Confidential ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Shiva Skunk specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Shiva Skunk ↗
Classificationindicaindica
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference17%17%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpenePineneMyrcene
TerpenesPinene, Caryophyllene, MyrceneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene
AromaPine, Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbalEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Pine
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedSkunk 1 (Reported parent), Northern Lights #5 (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsAfghani (Ancestry component)Not verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesLA Confidential also appears under Confidential and Confidential OG. Leafly lists Afghani in its genetics section without establishing a complete two-parent pedigree. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Leafly reports Skunk 1 and Northern Lights #5 as the cross and attributes it to Sensi Seeds. This is a catalog pedigree, not DNA verification.
Source reports · whole profile1,414114

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Pinene, Caryophyllene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 17% for LA Confidential and 17% for Shiva Skunk. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →