AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

London Pound Cake
vs Triangle Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified London Pound Cake specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
London Pound Cake ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Triangle Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Triangle Kush ↗
Classificationhybridindica
BreederCookiesNot verified
THC · catalog reference20%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneNot verified
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsSherbert (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageParents unknown
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesLondon Pound Cake, also called Pound Cake, is associated with Cookies. Leafly identifies Sherbert as one parent but leaves the other indica parent unnamed. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Triangle Kush is associated with Florida, with a name referring to Jacksonville, Miami and Tampa. This catalog records its regional history while leaving the immediate parent identities unresolved.
Source reports · whole profile357308

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for London Pound Cake and 20% for Triangle Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →