SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Trainwreck
vs White Rhino
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Trainwreck source ↗White Rhino source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | indica |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 17% | 21% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Terpinolene | Myrcene |
| Terpenes | Terpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene | Myrcene, Pinene, Terpinolene |
| Aroma | Herbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, Pine | Earthy / herbal, Pine, Herbal, floral |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | White Widow (Reported parent), North American Indica (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Mexican ancestry (Ancestry component), Thai (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component) | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Trainwreck is associated with Northern California and a mixed Mexican, Thai and Afghan background. Its family record keeps those regional contributions distinct from a verified immediate parent pair. | White Rhino is described as a White Widow cross with North American Indica. The regional name does not identify a single verified parent accession. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 3,234 | 1,265 |
Explore Trainwreck family ↗Explore White Rhino family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Terpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 17% for Trainwreck and 21% for White Rhino. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

