SFV OG
SFV OG takes its name from California’s San Fernando Valley and is associated with Cali Connection. It belongs to the OG Kush family and differs from the later Afghani-crossed SFV OG Kush.
Ancestry documented · Explore family ↓Compare this strain ↗Effects & flavor notes.
Explore the words people use to describe SFV OG.
Reported effects
Subjective feelings described by readers.
These are subjective reports, not guaranteed effects or medical conclusions. The report total covers the whole profile; individual tag frequencies are unavailable.
How to read these reportsParents, origins & family
Ancestry documented
SFV OG takes its name from California’s San Fernando Valley and is associated with Cali Connection. It belongs to the OG Kush family and differs from the later Afghani-crossed SFV OG Kush. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Reported ancestry
OG KushOpen strain profileReported background; the complete sequence of crosses is not documented.
Leafly — SFV OG identity and lineage ↗Children & later selections 1
Larry OGOpen strain profileReported parent in the linked Leafly profile; not genetically authenticated.
Leafly — Larry OG identity and lineage ↗How to read these relationships
Parent links describe a reported cross. Ancestry components may be several generations back. A phenotype selection comes from a named line rather than a new two-parent cross. Disputed links retain the uncertainty of their source.
Names in this catalog open a strain profile. Other names open the reference describing the relationship. The family view shows the links currently documented here, not every known descendant.
Cannabinoid profile
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown.
Leafly source ↗ · Checked 2026-09-16Concentrations vary by sample. A cultivar name alone does not establish potency.
Terpenes & aroma
Catalog-listed terpenes. Dominance is shown only where the source states it; percentages are unavailable unless separately recorded.
Similar strains
Similarity uses catalog reference chemistry, reported attributes and lineage. Missing data is excluded; this is not an effects prediction.
Wedding Crasher, also listed as Wedding Crashers, is associated with Symbiotic Genetics. Its reported parents are Wedding Cake and Purple Punch.
Reported parentage ↗
Northern Lights is listed by Leafly as an indica with reported Afghani and Thai ancestry. Its history section treats the Seattle origin story as a rumor and describes later distribution through the Netherlands. That uncertainty is part of the record, not a missing detail to fill by guesswork. Pine, earth and wood appear in its reader flavor tags. Numbered selections such as Northern Lights #5 require their own provenance rather than automatic equivalence with this broader entry.
Reported parentage ↗
Tahoe OG is described as a phenotype of OG Kush rather than a separately documented two-parent cross. Tahoe OG Kush is another name for the same catalog profile.
Phenotype selection ↗Compare with related strains
Choose another strain to compare →References & provenance
Editorial review pending. This public profile includes draft descriptions and attributed catalog information; source checks are not independent verification of every claim.
- Leafly — SFV OG identity and lineage
SFV OG takes its name from California’s San Fernando Valley and is associated with Cali Connection. It belongs to the OG Kush family and differs from the later Afghani-crossed SFV OG Kush. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Accessed 2026-09-16 - Leafly — sfv og catalog parameters
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Terpene names and documented order come from the catalog; concentrations are not supplied. Effects, flavors and negative effects are reader-reported tags. The report count covers the profile as a whole, not individual tags.
Accessed 2026-09-16
Updated 2026-09-18 · Our editorial standards