AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
White Fire OG — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly ↗
CULTIVAR FIELD NOTES

White Fire OG

hybrid

White Fire OG is listed by Leafly as a Fire OG and The White cross and is also known by several WiFi names. Those aliases map to one catalog entry without implying that every similarly named product is genetically identical.

Reported parentage · Explore family ↓Compare this strain ↗
Classificationhybrid
THC · reference22%
CBD · referenceNot reported
Dominant terpeneMyrcene
BreederNot verified
OriginNot verified
01 / REPORTED EXPERIENCES

Effects & flavor notes.

Explore the words people use to describe White Fire OG.

1,086reports on Leafly · whole profile
THE EXPERIENCE

Reported effects

Subjective feelings described by readers.

THE SENSORY NOTES

Flavors & aromas

Reader-reported flavor descriptors.

ALSO REPORTED

Unwanted effects

No sourced reports yet.

These are subjective reports, not guaranteed effects or medical conclusions. The report total covers the whole profile; individual tag frequencies are unavailable.

How to read these reports
02 / GENETIC CONNECTIONS

Parents, origins & family

Reported parentage
The cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.

100%

Reported parents

THIS STRAINWhite Fire OGReported parentage

Children & later selections 0

No children linked in this catalog yet.

How to read these relationships

Parent links describe a reported cross. Ancestry components may be several generations back. A phenotype selection comes from a named line rather than a new two-parent cross. Disputed links retain the uncertainty of their source.

Names in this catalog open a strain profile. Other names open the reference describing the relationship. The family view shows the links currently documented here, not every known descendant.

03 / PLANT CHEMISTRY

Cannabinoid profile

CATALOG REFERENCE

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown.

Leafly source ↗ · Checked 2026-09-28

Concentrations vary by sample. A cultivar name alone does not establish potency.

Terpenes & aroma

Catalog-listed terpenes. Dominance is shown only where the source states it; percentages are unavailable unless separately recorded.

Similar strains

Similarity uses catalog reference chemistry, reported attributes and lineage. Missing data is excluded; this is not an effects prediction.

SFV OG — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
hybrid02
SFV OG

SFV OG takes its name from California’s San Fernando Valley and is associated with Cali Connection. It belongs to the OG Kush family and differs from the later Afghani-crossed SFV OG Kush.

Ancestry documented ↗
THC 20%CBD 0%
Catalog reference valuesCompare +
Super Silver Haze — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
sativa03
Super Silver Haze

Super Silver Haze is attributed to Green House Seeds and a background involving Skunk, Northern Lights and Haze. The source supplies those ancestry names but does not establish the exact sequence of crosses.

Ancestry documented ↗
THC 21%CBD Not reported
Catalog reference valuesCompare +

Compare with related strains

Choose another strain to compare →
04 / FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

References & provenance

Editorial review pending. This public profile includes draft descriptions and attributed catalog information; source checks are not independent verification of every claim.

  • Leafly — White Fire OG identity and lineage

    The cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.

    Accessed 2026-09-28
  • Leafly — white fire og catalog parameters

    Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Terpene names and documented order come from the catalog; concentrations are not supplied. Effects, flavors and negative effects are reader-reported tags. The report count covers the profile as a whole, not individual tags.

    Accessed 2026-09-28

Updated 2026-10-06 · Our editorial standards