AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Acapulco Gold
vs Bruce Banner

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Acapulco Gold — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Acapulco Gold ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Bruce Banner specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Bruce Banner ↗
Classificationsativahybrid
BreederNot verifiedDark Horse Genetics
THC · catalog reference18%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedNot verified
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Myrcene, LimoneneCaryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene
AromaPepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, CitrusPepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedOG Kush (Reported parent), Strawberry Diesel (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesAcapulco Gold is associated with the area around Acapulco in Mexico. The regional origin is documented separately from a modern, named two-parent pedigree. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Bruce Banner is attributed to Dark Horse Genetics and a cross of OG Kush with Strawberry Diesel. Numbered selections such as Bruce Banner #3 are not automatically treated as identical samples. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile8801,443

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 18% for Acapulco Gold and 21% for Bruce Banner. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →