SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Alaskan Thunder Fuck
vs Mendo Montage
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Alaskan Thunder Fuck source ↗Mendo Montage source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 16% | Not reported |
| CBD · catalog reference | 0% | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Myrcene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene | Not verified |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus | Not verified |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | Mendocino Purps (Reported parent), Crystal Locomotive F1 (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Afghani (Ancestry component) | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Alaskan Thunder Fuck is associated with Alaska’s Matanuska Valley. Leafly presents its early Californian and Russian background as a legend, followed by a reported Afghani contribution. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Crystal Locomotive F1 remains a named external parent. No cannabinoid percentages or terpene ranking were displayed in the reviewed source. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 2,226 | 4 |
Explore Alaskan Thunder Fuck family ↗Explore Mendo Montage family ↗
Similarities
No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.
Main differences
Comparable source values are needed before describing chemical differences.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.