AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Alien OG
vs Fire OG

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Alien OG specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Alien OG ↗
Fire OG — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Fire OG ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference19%20%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, LimoneneMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, CitrusEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsTahoe OG (Reported parent), Alien Kush (Reported parent)OG Kush (Reported parent), SFV OG Kush (Reported parent)
Lineage statusReported parentageReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesAlien OG connects Tahoe OG with Alien Kush. Leafly describes its availability first as a Bay Area clone and later in seed form through Cali Connection. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Fire OG is reported as OG Kush crossed with SFV OG Kush. The latter is distinct from SFV OG, so the two names are not merged in its parent links. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,2411,260

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 19% for Alien OG and 20% for Fire OG. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →