SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Blue Zushi
vs Chemdawg
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Blue Zushi source ↗Chemdawg source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Chemdog |
| THC · catalog reference | 25% | 18% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Limonene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Limonene, Caryophyllene | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Citrus, Pepper / spice | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported parents | The Original Z (Reported parent), Kush Mints (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Parents unknown |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Leafly reports Zkittlez and Kush Mints as the immediate parents; this remains an attributed catalog relationship. | Leafly recounts a bag-seed origin. The original parents are not identified; later descendants do not establish its own parentage. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 113 | 2,505 |
Explore Blue Zushi family ↗Explore Chemdawg family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Caryophyllene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 25% for Blue Zushi and 18% for Chemdawg. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.