SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Blueberry OG
vs Mendocino Purps
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Blueberry OG source ↗Mendocino Purps source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 15% | Not reported |
| CBD · catalog reference | 0% | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Pinene, Limonene | Not verified |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pine, Citrus | Not verified |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Blueberry (Reported parent), OG Kush (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Parents unknown |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | The Blueberry phenotype and OG Kush connection is source-reported. Narrative CBD claims and the displayed 0% reference value are inconsistent and require sample-specific corroboration. | The source does not establish a complete parent cross. Mendo Purps is an alias; later seed versions should not be assumed identical to the original clone. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 94 | 324 |
Explore Blueberry OG family ↗Explore Mendocino Purps family ↗
Similarities
No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.
Main differences
Comparable source values are needed before describing chemical differences.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.