AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Chemdawg
vs SinMint Cookies

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
chemdawg — photo from Leafly community
Photo: Leafly community
Chemdawg ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified SinMint Cookies specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
SinMint Cookies ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederChemdogSin City Seeds
THC · catalog reference18%19%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedNot verified
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Myrcene, LimoneneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Humulene
AromaPepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, CitrusPepper / spice, Citrus, Woody, earthy
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedGSC (Reported parent), Blue Power (Reported parent)
Lineage statusParents unknownReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesLeafly recounts a bag-seed origin. The original parents are not identified; later descendants do not establish its own parentage.SinMint Cookies is associated with Sin City Seeds. Leafly describes it as a GSC and Blue Power cross with an aroma that includes mint-associated notes. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile2,505114

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 18% for Chemdawg and 19% for SinMint Cookies. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →