AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Gelato #41
vs Master Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Gelato #41 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Gelato #41 ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Master Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Master Kush ↗
Classificationhybridindica
BreederNot verifiedWhite Label Seed Company
THC · catalog reference21%17%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneMyrcene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsSherbert (Reported parent), Thin Mint (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesSource-reported cross; the numbered identity is retained separately from the broad Gelato profile without claiming genetic authentication.Master Kush is attributed to the Dutch White Label Seed Company. Leafly describes two regional landrace parents from the Hindu Kush area but does not identify their individual accessions. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile2951,826

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 21% for Gelato #41 and 17% for Master Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →