AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Georgia Pie
vs SinMint Cookies

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Georgia Pie specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Georgia Pie ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified SinMint Cookies specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
SinMint Cookies ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedSin City Seeds
THC · catalog reference20%19%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneNot verified
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, HumuleneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Humulene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Woody, earthyPepper / spice, Citrus, Woody, earthy
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsNot verifiedGSC (Reported parent), Blue Power (Reported parent)
Lineage statusParents unknownReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.SinMint Cookies is associated with Sin City Seeds. Leafly describes it as a GSC and Blue Power cross with an aroma that includes mint-associated notes. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile232114

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Humulene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Georgia Pie and 19% for SinMint Cookies. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →