SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Jealousy
vs Runtz
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Jealousy source ↗Runtz source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Seed Junky Genetics | Cookies Fam |
| THC · catalog reference | 25% | 21% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | 0% |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene |
| Aroma | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Sherbert Bx1 (Reported parent), Gelato #41 (Reported parent) | The Original Z (Reported parent), Gelato (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Jealousy is attributed to Seed Junky Genetics. Its reported parents are Sherbert Bx1 and Gelato 41; the backcross and numbered selection are preserved as distinct parent identities. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Runtz is reported as a cross of The Original Z, also known as Zkittlez, and Gelato. This connects it to both the Z and Cookies-related families; the original profile is kept distinct from other Runtz-named selections. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 399 | 1,138 |
Explore Jealousy family ↗Explore Runtz family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 25% for Jealousy and 21% for Runtz. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

