SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
London Pound Cake
vs Master Kush
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
London Pound Cake source ↗Master Kush source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | indica |
| Breeder | Cookies | White Label Seed Company |
| THC · catalog reference | 20% | 17% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Caryophyllene | Myrcene |
| Terpenes | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Sherbert (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | London Pound Cake, also called Pound Cake, is associated with Cookies. Leafly identifies Sherbert as one parent but leaves the other indica parent unnamed. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Master Kush is attributed to the Dutch White Label Seed Company. Leafly describes two regional landrace parents from the Hindu Kush area but does not identify their individual accessions. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 357 | 1,826 |
Explore London Pound Cake family ↗Explore Master Kush family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 20% for London Pound Cake and 17% for Master Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

