AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Master Kush
vs Mendo Breath

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Master Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Master Kush ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Mendo Breath specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Mendo Breath ↗
Classificationindicaindica
BreederWhite Label Seed CompanyNot verified
THC · catalog reference17%19%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneCaryophyllene
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, LimoneneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, CitrusPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedOGKB (Reported parent), Mendo Montage (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesMaster Kush is attributed to the Dutch White Label Seed Company. Leafly describes two regional landrace parents from the Hindu Kush area but does not identify their individual accessions. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Source-reported OGKB and Mendo Montage cross. The F2 alias does not establish the generation of an individual product.
Source reports · whole profile1,826558

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 17% for Master Kush and 19% for Mendo Breath. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →