SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Master Kush
vs Pink Panties
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Master Kush source ↗Pink Panties source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | indica | indica |
| Breeder | White Label Seed Company | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 17% | 19% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Myrcene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | Burmese Kush (Reported parent), Florida Kush backcross (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Master Kush is attributed to the Dutch White Label Seed Company. Leafly describes two regional landrace parents from the Hindu Kush area but does not identify their individual accessions. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Pink Panties is reported as Burmese Kush crossed with a Florida Kush backcross. The backcross designation is preserved because it is more specific than the broad Florida Kush name. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 1,826 | 88 |
Explore Master Kush family ↗Explore Pink Panties family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 17% for Master Kush and 19% for Pink Panties. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.