SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Mendocino Purps
vs Zoap
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Mendocino Purps source ↗Zoap source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | Not reported | 21% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Not verified | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Humulene |
| Aroma | Not verified | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Woody, earthy |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported parents | Not verified | Rainbow Sherbet (Reported parent), Pink Guava (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Parents unknown | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | The source does not establish a complete parent cross. Mendo Purps is an alias; later seed versions should not be assumed identical to the original clone. | The cited source reports Rainbow Sherbet and Pink Guava. Both remain external identities because similar names in the catalog do not prove equivalence. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 324 | 158 |
Explore Mendocino Purps family ↗Explore Zoap family ↗
Similarities
No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.
Main differences
Comparable source values are needed before describing chemical differences.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.