SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Peanut Butter Breath
vs Purple Punch
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Peanut Butter Breath source ↗Purple Punch source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | ThugPug Genetics | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 20% | 18% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | 0% |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Limonene | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Limonene, Caryophyllene, Pinene | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Pinene |
| Aroma | Citrus, Pepper / spice, Pine | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Pine |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Dosidos (Reported parent), Mendo Breath (Reported parent) | Larry OG (Reported parent), Granddaddy Purple (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Peanut Butter Breath is attributed to ThugPug Genetics and a Dosidos–Mendo Breath cross. Similar peanut-themed names are not assumed to denote this same cultivar. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Purple Punch is reported as a cross between Larry OG and Granddaddy Purple. Its profile connects those two named parents and keeps reader-reported grape and plum notes separate from chemical reference values. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 517 | 1,771 |
Explore Peanut Butter Breath family ↗Explore Purple Punch family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 20% for Peanut Butter Breath and 18% for Purple Punch. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

