SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Pink Runtz
vs Thin Mint
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Pink Runtz source ↗Thin Mint source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 25% | 20% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Limonene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Limonene, Caryophyllene, Linalool | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Linalool |
| Aroma | Citrus, Pepper / spice, Floral | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Floral |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported parents | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Phenotype selection | Phenotype selection |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Runtz (Phenotype selection) | GSC (Phenotype selection) |
| Lineage notes | The source associates Pink Runtz with the Runtz family. A phenotype or selection link is kept distinct from a new parent cross. | Thin Mint is described as a distinct selection within the GSC family. It appears in the reported background of Gelato, making it a useful link between the Cookies family and later named cultivars. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 440 | 895 |
Explore Pink Runtz family ↗Explore Thin Mint family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Caryophyllene, Linalool.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 25% for Pink Runtz and 20% for Thin Mint. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.