AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

SFV OG Kush
vs Skywalker

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
SFV OG Kush — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
SFV OG Kush ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Skywalker specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Skywalker ↗
Classificationindicahybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference19%20%
CBD · catalog reference0%0%
CBG · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
Dominant terpeneMyrceneNot verified
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, LimoneneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, CitrusEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsSFV OG (Reported parent · disputed)Blueberry OG (Reported parent), Mazar I Sharif (Reported parent)
Lineage statusDisputed parentageReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe current source names OG Kush as the other parent, conflicting with the previously captured SFV OG account. That disputed second edge is omitted pending corroboration. Overlapping SFV aliases are not assigned to both profiles.Skywalker is kept separate from Skywalker OG. The linked Leafly genetics panel names Blueberry OG and Mazar I Sharif; those specific identities are preserved in the pedigree. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile2531,104

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 19% for SFV OG Kush and 20% for Skywalker. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →