SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Thin Mint
vs White Runtz
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Thin Mint source ↗White Runtz source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 20% | 18% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | 0% |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Linalool | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Linalool |
| Aroma | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Floral | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Floral |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported parents | Not verified | Gelato (Reported parent), The Original Z (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Phenotype selection | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | GSC (Phenotype selection) | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Thin Mint is described as a distinct selection within the GSC family. It appears in the reported background of Gelato, making it a useful link between the Cookies family and later named cultivars. | The cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 895 | 456 |
Explore Thin Mint family ↗Explore White Runtz family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Linalool.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 20% for Thin Mint and 18% for White Runtz. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.