AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Black Tuna
vs GMO Cookies

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Black Tuna illustrative photo
Illustrative photo: Leafly catalog reference; illustrative image
Black Tuna ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified GMO Cookies specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
GMO Cookies ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedMamiko Seeds
THC · catalog referenceNot reported28%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedCaryophyllene
TerpenesNot verifiedCaryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene
AromaNot verifiedPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal
Flavor

No sourced reports yet.

Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedGSC (Reported parent), Chemdawg (Reported parent)
Lineage statusParents unknownReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesNo direct parent relationship is established in this catalog import; lineage remains unconfirmed.GMO Cookies also appears as Garlic Cookies. Leafly attributes this GSC and Chemdawg cross to Mamiko Seeds, with garlic and fuel associations in its description. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profileNot verified1,219

Similarities

No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.

Main differences

Comparable source values are needed before describing chemical differences.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →