SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Bubba Kush
vs Lemon OG
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Bubba Kush source ↗Lemon OG source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | indica | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 17% | 19% |
| CBD · catalog reference | 0% | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Caryophyllene | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | OG Kush (Reported parent · disputed), Bubba (unidentified indica) (Reported parent · disputed) | Lemon Skunk (Reported parent), OG #18 (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Disputed parentage | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | OG Kush and an unidentified indica called Bubba are reported. The suggestion that Bubba was Northern Lights is unresolved, so no Northern Lights parent link is asserted. | Lemon OG is described as a cross of a Las Vegas Lemon Skunk selection and OG #18. The Lemon Skunk link identifies the family; the particular Las Vegas selection is not a separate catalog record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 3,644 | 567 |
Explore Bubba Kush family ↗Explore Lemon OG family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 17% for Bubba Kush and 19% for Lemon OG. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.