AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Bubble Gum
vs Strawberry Banana

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Bubble Gum specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Bubble Gum ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Strawberry Banana specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Strawberry Banana ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference17%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneLimonene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneLimonene, Myrcene, Caryophyllene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalCitrus, Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedBanana Kush (Reported parent), Bubble Gum (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsIndiana Bubble Gum (Ancestry component)Not verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesIndiana Bubble Gum is a reported ancestral line. The linked source does not establish the other parent or a fully authenticated cross.Strawberry Banana, or Strawnana, is attributed to DNA Genetics working with Serious Seeds. Its reported parents are Crockett’s Banana Kush and the Strawberry selection of Bubble Gum. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,291745

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 17% for Bubble Gum and 21% for Strawberry Banana. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →