AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Bubble Gum
vs Wedding Crasher

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Bubble Gum specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Bubble Gum ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Wedding Crasher specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Wedding Crasher ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedSymbiotic Genetics
THC · catalog reference17%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneCaryophyllene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedWedding Cake (Reported parent), Purple Punch (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsIndiana Bubble Gum (Ancestry component)Not verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesIndiana Bubble Gum is a reported ancestral line. The linked source does not establish the other parent or a fully authenticated cross.Wedding Crasher, also listed as Wedding Crashers, is associated with Symbiotic Genetics. Its reported parents are Wedding Cake and Purple Punch. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,291358

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 17% for Bubble Gum and 21% for Wedding Crasher. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →