SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Chem Sis
vs Stardawg
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Chem Sis source ↗Stardawg source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | sativa | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 22% | 22% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | 0% |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Myrcene | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene | Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus | Pepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbal |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported parents | Not verified | Tres Dawg (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Phenotype selection | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Chemdawg (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Chemdawg (Phenotype selection) | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | The source identifies a Chemdawg phenotype. The selection history is attributed, not genetically authenticated. | The cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 21 | 852 |
Explore Chem Sis family ↗Explore Stardawg family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 22% for Chem Sis and 22% for Stardawg. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.