AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Chocolope
vs Super Silver Haze

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Chocolope — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Chocolope ↗
Super Silver Haze — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Super Silver Haze ↗
Classificationsativasativa
BreederNot verifiedGreen House Seeds
THC · catalog reference22%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference3%1%
Dominant terpeneTerpinoleneMyrcene
TerpenesTerpinolene, Myrcene, OcimeneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaHerbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, Sweet, herbalEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsChocolate Thai (Reported parent), Cannalope Haze (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedSkunk (unspecified) (Ancestry component), Northern Lights (Ancestry component), Haze (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesChocolope, also called D-Line, is reported to combine Chocolate Thai and Cannalope Haze. Its catalog identity connects chocolate-associated Thai genetics with the Haze family. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Super Silver Haze is attributed to Green House Seeds and a background involving Skunk, Northern Lights and Haze. The source supplies those ancestry names but does not establish the exact sequence of crosses.
Source reports · whole profile1,4192,417

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 22% for Chocolope and 21% for Super Silver Haze. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →