AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Face Off OG
vs Master Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Face Off OG specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Face Off OG ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Master Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Master Kush ↗
Classificationindicaindica
BreederNot verifiedWhite Label Seed Company
THC · catalog reference22%17%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusPhenotype selectionAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromOG Kush (Phenotype selection)Not verified
Lineage notesFace Off OG is associated with Archive Seeds and a California OG Kush selection from the late 1990s. This is represented as selection history rather than an invented two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Master Kush is attributed to the Dutch White Label Seed Company. Leafly describes two regional landrace parents from the Hindu Kush area but does not identify their individual accessions. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1951,826

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 22% for Face Off OG and 17% for Master Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →