AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

GMO Cookies
vs Kosher Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified GMO Cookies specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
GMO Cookies ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Kosher Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Kosher Kush ↗
Classificationhybridindica
BreederMamiko SeedsNot verified
THC · catalog reference28%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneMyrcene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, MyrceneMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, Earthy / herbalEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsGSC (Reported parent), Chemdawg (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedOG Kush (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesGMO Cookies also appears as Garlic Cookies. Leafly attributes this GSC and Chemdawg cross to Mamiko Seeds, with garlic and fuel associations in its description. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Kosher Kush began as a Los Angeles clone-only line and is associated with DNA Genetics. Leafly relates it to OG Kush without documenting a complete two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,2191,082

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene, Myrcene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 28% for GMO Cookies and 21% for Kosher Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →