AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Grape Ape
vs Mango

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Grape Ape — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Grape Ape ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Mango specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Mango ↗
Classificationindicaindica
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference18%17%
CBD · catalog reference0%0%
CBG · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Pinene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsNot verifiedKC 33 (Reported parent), Afghani (Reported parent)
Lineage statusAncestry documentedReported parentage
Ancestry componentsMendocino Purps (Ancestry component), Skunk (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component)Not verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesGrape Ape is associated with Apothecary Genetics and Barney’s Farm. Its reported background includes Mendocino Purps, Skunk and Afghani, without a fully specified crossing sequence. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.The cited catalog page does not establish a complete, authenticated immediate-parent cross for this entry.
Source reports · whole profile2,274563

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 18% for Grape Ape and 17% for Mango. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →