AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Grapefruit
vs Mimosa

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Grapefruit specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Grapefruit ↗
Mimosa — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Mimosa ↗
Classificationsativahybrid
BreederNot verifiedSymbiotic Genetics
THC · catalog reference19%19%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, PineneMyrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, PineEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsCinderella 99 (Reported parent)Clementine (Reported parent), Purple Punch (Reported parent)
Lineage statusReported parentageReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesGrapefruit is reported as Cinderella 99 crossed with an unnamed sativa landrace. Leafly mentions both Nectar Seeds and Positronic Seeds, so no single breeder attribution is assigned here. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Mimosa is reported as Clementine crossed with Purple Punch and is associated with Symbiotic Genetics. Purple Mimosa is an alternate name recorded on the source page. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile6241,182

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 19% for Grapefruit and 19% for Mimosa. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →