SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Grapefruit
vs Mimosa
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Grapefruit source ↗Mimosa source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | sativa | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Symbiotic Genetics |
| THC · catalog reference | 19% | 19% |
| CBD · catalog reference | 0% | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Myrcene |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene | Myrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Pine | Earthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Cinderella 99 (Reported parent) | Clementine (Reported parent), Purple Punch (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Grapefruit is reported as Cinderella 99 crossed with an unnamed sativa landrace. Leafly mentions both Nectar Seeds and Positronic Seeds, so no single breeder attribution is assigned here. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Mimosa is reported as Clementine crossed with Purple Punch and is associated with Symbiotic Genetics. Purple Mimosa is an alternate name recorded on the source page. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 624 | 1,182 |
Explore Grapefruit family ↗Explore Mimosa family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 19% for Grapefruit and 19% for Mimosa. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

