AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Grapefruit
vs Red Congolese

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Grapefruit specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Grapefruit ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Red Congolese specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Red Congolese ↗
Classificationsativasativa
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference19%23%
CBD · catalog reference0%0%
CBG · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, PineneMyrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, PineEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsCinderella 99 (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageDisputed parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedAfghani (Ancestry component · disputed), Mexican (Ancestry component · disputed)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesGrapefruit is reported as Cinderella 99 crossed with an unnamed sativa landrace. Leafly mentions both Nectar Seeds and Positronic Seeds, so no single breeder attribution is assigned here. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Leafly notes differing origin accounts. Afghani and Mexican roots are retained only as disputed ancestry for a California version, not as universal parentage.
Source reports · whole profile624243

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 19% for Grapefruit and 23% for Red Congolese. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →