AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Green Goblin
vs Skunk 1

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Green Goblin specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Green Goblin ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Skunk 1 specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Skunk 1 ↗
Classificationsativahybrid
BreederNot verifiedSacred Seed Co.
THC · catalog reference14%17%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Pinene, LimoneneMyrcene, Limonene, Pinene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pine, CitrusEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pine
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusDisputed parentageAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsNorthern Lights (Ancestry component · disputed), Skunk 1 (Ancestry component · disputed)Afghani (Ancestry component), Acapulco Gold (Ancestry component), Colombian Gold (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesThe source presents varying identity accounts. Northern Lights and Skunk #1 are retained only as disputed ancestry and not as settled direct parents.Skunk #1 is associated with Sacred Seed Co. and selection work involving Afghani, Acapulco Gold and Colombian Gold. Its family record represents that multi-generation background rather than a simple two-parent cross.
Source reports · whole profile146531

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Pinene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 14% for Green Goblin and 17% for Skunk 1. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →