AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Haze
vs Red Congolese

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
haze — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Haze ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Red Congolese specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Red Congolese ↗
Classificationsativasativa
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference18%23%
CBD · catalog reference0%0%
CBG · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Pinene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Pine, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects

No sourced reports yet.

Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusAncestry documentedDisputed parentage
Ancestry componentsColombian ancestry (Ancestry component), Mexican ancestry (Ancestry component), Thai (Ancestry component), South Indian ancestry (Ancestry component)Afghani (Ancestry component · disputed), Mexican (Ancestry component · disputed)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesLeafly describes Colombian, Mexican, Thai and South Indian ancestry. This is a catalog account of regional ancestry, not a resolved direct-parent tree.Leafly notes differing origin accounts. Afghani and Mexican roots are retained only as disputed ancestry for a California version, not as universal parentage.
Source reports · whole profile502243

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Pinene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 18% for Haze and 23% for Red Congolese. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →