AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Hindu Kush
vs Ice Cream Cake

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Hindu Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Hindu Kush ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Ice Cream Cake specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Ice Cream Cake ↗
Classificationindicahybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference19%22%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneLimoneneCaryophyllene
TerpenesLimonene, Caryophyllene, PineneCaryophyllene, Limonene, Linalool
AromaCitrus, Pepper / spice, PinePepper / spice, Citrus, Floral
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedWedding Cake (Reported parent), Gelato #33 (Reported parent)
Lineage statusRegional originReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesHindu Kush takes its name from the mountain region spanning parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan. This entry documents that regional background and the source's catalog traits without assigning an unsupported parent cross.Ice Cream Cake is reported as Wedding Cake crossed with Gelato #33. Its pedigree links to the numbered Gelato selection rather than the broader Gelato family record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,2791,497

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 19% for Hindu Kush and 22% for Ice Cream Cake. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →