AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Hindu Kush
vs Peanut Butter Breath

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Hindu Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Hindu Kush ↗
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Peanut Butter Breath specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Peanut Butter Breath ↗
Classificationindicahybrid
BreederNot verifiedThugPug Genetics
THC · catalog reference19%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneLimoneneLimonene
TerpenesLimonene, Caryophyllene, PineneLimonene, Caryophyllene, Pinene
AromaCitrus, Pepper / spice, PineCitrus, Pepper / spice, Pine
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedDosidos (Reported parent), Mendo Breath (Reported parent)
Lineage statusRegional originReported parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesHindu Kush takes its name from the mountain region spanning parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan. This entry documents that regional background and the source's catalog traits without assigning an unsupported parent cross.Peanut Butter Breath is attributed to ThugPug Genetics and a Dosidos–Mendo Breath cross. Similar peanut-themed names are not assumed to denote this same cultivar. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,279517

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Limonene, Caryophyllene, Pinene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 19% for Hindu Kush and 20% for Peanut Butter Breath. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →