AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Ice Cream Cake
vs OG Kush

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Ice Cream Cake specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Ice Cream Cake ↗
og kush — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
OG Kush ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference22%25%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpeneCaryophylleneMyrcene
TerpenesCaryophyllene, Limonene, LinaloolMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaPepper / spice, Citrus, FloralEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsWedding Cake (Reported parent), Gelato #33 (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageDisputed parentage
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedChemdawg (Ancestry component · disputed), Lemon Thai (Ancestry component · disputed), Hindu Kush (Ancestry component · disputed)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesIce Cream Cake is reported as Wedding Cake crossed with Gelato #33. Its pedigree links to the numbered Gelato selection rather than the broader Gelato family record. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Leafly recounts a proposed mix involving Chemdawg, Lemon Thai, Hindu Kush and an unnamed Northern California plant. The direct parent identities and crossing order are uncertain.
Source reports · whole profile1,4975,695

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Caryophyllene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 22% for Ice Cream Cake and 25% for OG Kush. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →