SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Kosher Kush
vs GG4
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Kosher Kush source ↗GG4 source ↗
| Profile | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | indica | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | GG Strains LLC |
| THC · catalog reference | 21% | 20% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | 0% |
| CBG · catalog reference | 1% | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Myrcene | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | OG Kush (Ancestry component) | Chem Sis (Ancestry component), Sour Dubb (Ancestry component), Chocolate Diesel (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Kosher Kush began as a Los Angeles clone-only line and is associated with DNA Genetics. Leafly relates it to OG Kush without documenting a complete two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | GG4, also known as Original Glue, is attributed to GG Strains LLC. Its reported background includes Chem's Sister, Sour Dubb and Chocolate Diesel, which are listed as ancestry without assuming an undocumented crossing order. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 1,082 | 5,553 |
Explore Kosher Kush family ↗Explore GG4 family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 21% for Kosher Kush and 20% for GG4. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

