AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Kosher Kush
vs GG4

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Kosher Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Kosher Kush ↗
GG4 — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
GG4 ↗
Classificationindicahybrid
BreederNot verifiedGG Strains LLC
THC · catalog reference21%20%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reported0%
CBG · catalog reference1%Not reported
Dominant terpeneMyrceneCaryophyllene
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneCaryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spicePepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusAncestry documentedAncestry documented
Ancestry componentsOG Kush (Ancestry component)Chem Sis (Ancestry component), Sour Dubb (Ancestry component), Chocolate Diesel (Ancestry component)
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesKosher Kush began as a Los Angeles clone-only line and is associated with DNA Genetics. Leafly relates it to OG Kush without documenting a complete two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.GG4, also known as Original Glue, is attributed to GG Strains LLC. Its reported background includes Chem's Sister, Sour Dubb and Chocolate Diesel, which are listed as ancestry without assuming an undocumented crossing order.
Source reports · whole profile1,0825,553

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 21% for Kosher Kush and 20% for GG4. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →