AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Kosher Kush
vs Tahoe OG

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Kosher Kush specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Kosher Kush ↗
Tahoe OG — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
Tahoe OG ↗
Classificationindicahybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference21%21%
CBD · catalog referenceNot reportedNot reported
CBG · catalog reference1%1%
Dominant terpeneMyrceneMyrcene
TerpenesMyrcene, Limonene, CaryophylleneMyrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spiceEarthy / herbal, Citrus, Pepper / spice
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage statusAncestry documentedPhenotype selection
Ancestry componentsOG Kush (Ancestry component)Not verified
Selected fromNot verifiedOG Kush (Phenotype selection)
Lineage notesKosher Kush began as a Los Angeles clone-only line and is associated with DNA Genetics. Leafly relates it to OG Kush without documenting a complete two-parent cross. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.Tahoe OG is described as a phenotype of OG Kush rather than a separately documented two-parent cross. Tahoe OG Kush is another name for the same catalog profile. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.
Source reports · whole profile1,0821,534

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Limonene, Caryophyllene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 21% for Kosher Kush and 21% for Tahoe OG. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →