SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Lava Cake
vs Mendo Montage
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Lava Cake source ↗Mendo Montage source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | 17% | Not reported |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| Dominant terpene | Caryophyllene | Not verified |
| Terpenes | Caryophyllene | Not verified |
| Aroma | Pepper / spice | Not verified |
| Flavor | No sourced reports yet. | |
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | Mendocino Purps (Reported parent), Crystal Locomotive F1 (Reported parent) |
| Lineage status | Parents unknown | Reported parentage |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | No direct parent relationship is established in this catalog import; lineage remains unconfirmed. | Crystal Locomotive F1 remains a named external parent. No cannabinoid percentages or terpene ranking were displayed in the reviewed source. |
| Source reports · whole profile | Not verified | 4 |
Explore Lava Cake family ↗Explore Mendo Montage family ↗
Similarities
No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.
Main differences
Comparable source values are needed before describing chemical differences.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.