SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Mendo Montage
vs Trainwreck
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Mendo Montage source ↗Trainwreck source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | Not verified |
| THC · catalog reference | Not reported | 17% |
| CBD · catalog reference | Not reported | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Not verified | Terpinolene |
| Terpenes | Not verified | Terpinolene, Myrcene, Pinene |
| Aroma | Not verified | Herbal, floral, Earthy / herbal, Pine |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Mendocino Purps (Reported parent), Crystal Locomotive F1 (Reported parent) | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Reported parentage | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Not verified | Mexican ancestry (Ancestry component), Thai (Ancestry component), Afghani (Ancestry component) |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Crystal Locomotive F1 remains a named external parent. No cannabinoid percentages or terpene ranking were displayed in the reviewed source. | Trainwreck is associated with Northern California and a mixed Mexican, Thai and Afghan background. Its family record keeps those regional contributions distinct from a verified immediate parent pair. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 4 | 3,234 |
Explore Mendo Montage family ↗Explore Trainwreck family ↗
Similarities
No shared chemical profile has been established in these records.
Main differences
Comparable source values are needed before describing chemical differences.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.