AN INDEPENDENT GUIDE TO CANNABIS KNOWLEDGE Information, with context.
CannabisAtlasFIELD NOTES / VOL. 01
SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES

Skywalker
vs The White

Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Profile
Illustrative cannabis photo from Leafly; not a verified Skywalker specimen
Illustrative photo: Leafly
Skywalker ↗
The White — photo from Leafly
Photo: Leafly
The White ↗
Classificationhybridhybrid
BreederNot verifiedNot verified
THC · catalog reference20%21%
CBD · catalog reference0%Not reported
CBG · catalog referenceNot reported1%
Dominant terpeneNot verifiedCaryophyllene
TerpenesMyrcene, Caryophyllene, LimoneneCaryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene
AromaEarthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, CitrusPepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus
Flavor
Reported effects
Reported negative effects
Reported parentsBlueberry OG (Reported parent), Mazar I Sharif (Reported parent)Not verified
Lineage statusReported parentageParents unknown
Ancestry componentsNot verifiedNot verified
Selected fromNot verifiedNot verified
Lineage notesSkywalker is kept separate from Skywalker OG. The linked Leafly genetics panel names Blueberry OG and Mazar I Sharif; those specific identities are preserved in the pedigree. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree.The source presents the origin as uncertain. Triangle is not automatically resolved to Triangle Kush, and visual similarity is not parentage evidence.
Source reports · whole profile1,104383

Similarities

Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.

Main differences

The catalog lists THC at 20% for Skywalker and 21% for The White. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.

Keep the context

Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.

Start another comparison →