SIDE-BY-SIDE FIELD NOTES
Alaskan Thunder Fuck
vs Lemon Skunk
Leafly catalog summary values, not laboratory results for a specific sample. A displayed 0% is a rounded source value, not proof of absence. Unlisted cannabinoids remain unknown. Report totals are not per-effect sample sizes.
Alaskan Thunder Fuck source ↗Lemon Skunk source ↗
| Profile |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | hybrid | hybrid |
| Breeder | Not verified | DNA Genetics |
| THC · catalog reference | 16% | 19% |
| CBD · catalog reference | 0% | Not reported |
| CBG · catalog reference | Not reported | 1% |
| Dominant terpene | Myrcene | Caryophyllene |
| Terpenes | Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene | Caryophyllene, Myrcene, Limonene |
| Aroma | Earthy / herbal, Pepper / spice, Citrus | Pepper / spice, Earthy / herbal, Citrus |
| Flavor | ||
| Reported effects | ||
| Reported negative effects | ||
| Reported parents | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage status | Ancestry documented | Ancestry documented |
| Ancestry components | Afghani (Ancestry component) | Not verified |
| Selected from | Not verified | Not verified |
| Lineage notes | Alaskan Thunder Fuck is associated with Alaska’s Matanuska Valley. Leafly presents its early Californian and Russian background as a legend, followed by a reported Afghani contribution. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. | Lemon Skunk is attributed to DNA Genetics and two selected Skunk phenotypes. The individual selections are not named, so this record does not invent separate parent identities. This is a source-reported identity, not a genetically authenticated pedigree. |
| Source reports · whole profile | 2,226 | 1,110 |
Explore Alaskan Thunder Fuck family ↗Explore Lemon Skunk family ↗
Similarities
Shared documented terpenes: Myrcene, Caryophyllene, Limonene.
Main differences
The catalog lists THC at 16% for Alaskan Thunder Fuck and 19% for Lemon Skunk. These reference points do not establish a sample range or an individual product's potency.
Keep the context
Reported attributes are subjective. Classification and chemical similarity do not establish equivalent effects.